| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100802073400.68a6edd7@schatten.dmk.lab> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 07:34:00 +0200 From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arve@...roid.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz, rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu, swetland@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread Hi, On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:05:48 -0700 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote: > I'm a little worried that this whole "I need to block suspend" is > temporary. Yes today there is silicon from ARM and Intel where suspend > is a heavy operation, yet at the same time it's not all THAT heavy > anymore.... at least on the Intel side it's good enough to use pretty > much all the time (when the screen is off for now, but that's a memory > controller issue more than anything else). I'm pretty sure the ARM guys > will not be far behind. I think that the only thing that really matters (longterm) with suspend is that processes don't get scheduled anymore when the system is suspended. Cheers, Flo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists