lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100802144257.GN1647@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:42:57 -0500
From:	Ryan Harper <ryanh@...ibm.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	npiggin@...e.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org, bharata@...ibm.com,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] Add yield hypercall for KVM guests

* Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> [2010-08-02 03:33]:
>  On 07/26/2010 08:19 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > On 07/25/2010 11:14 PM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> >>Add KVM hypercall for yielding vcpu timeslice.
> >
> >Can you do a directed yield?
> >
> 
> A problem with directed yield is figuring out who to yield to.  One idea 
> is to look for a random vcpu that is not running and donate some runtime 
> to it.  In the best case, it's the lock holder and we cause it to start 
> running.  Middle case it's not the lock holder, but we lose enough 
> runtime to stop running, so at least we don't waste cpu.  Worst case we 
> continue running not having woken the lock holder.  Spin again, yield 
> again hoping to find the right vcpu.

It's been quite some time, but played with directed yielding for Xen[1]
and we were looking to model the POWER directed yield (H_CONFER) where
the lock holding vcpu was indiciated in the spinlock.  When acquiring
the lock, record the vcpu id.  When another vcpu attempts to acquire the
lock if it can't it can yield its time to the lock holder.

1.  http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-05/msg00776.html

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
ryanh@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ