[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8199.1280761913@localhost>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:11:53 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] vfs: only add " (deleted)" where necessary
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:35:20 +0200, Miklos Szeredi said:
> > I'd prefer the comment about it being ambiguous remain. I'm waiting
> > to see how long it takes for somebody to create a security hole by
> > creating a file called '/etc/some/thing/important (deleted)' and
> > having some software Do The Wrong Thing instead to
> > /etc/some/thing/important.
>
> The same comment is left intact on top of d_path().
>
> It is removed from __d_path() because this function no longer appends
> "(deleted)".
Oh, OK. Obviously -ENOCAFFEINE on my part, I thought you were nuking the
d_path() copy. ;)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists