[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1280765075.22830.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:04:35 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: xiaohui.xin@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au, jdike@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 00/16] Provide a zero-copy method on KVM
virtio-net.
Hello Michael,
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 11:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I think we should explore the idea for the driver to fall back on data
> copy
> for small message sizes.
> The benefit of zero copy would then be CPU utilization on large
> messages.
Yes, we used to have 128 bytes for small copy in other driver. I saw
Xiaohui's patch here is using 64 bytes. I think we need to compare the
performance on different platform to decide what's the best for small
message size.
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists