[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100803022310.bec3ba79.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 02:23:10 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree
related)
Hi all,
Lots (if not all) of the arm builds failed for next-20100802 with these
errors:
arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'arm_bootmem_init':
arch/arm/mm/init.c:184: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_start_pfn'
arch/arm/mm/init.c:186: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_end_pfn'
arch/arm/mm/init.c:188: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_size_bytes'
Caused by commit 53e16bfaf19346f59b3502e207aa66c61332075c ("memblock:
Introduce for_each_memblock() and new accessors, and use it") interacting
with commit 2778f62056ada442414392d7ccd41188bb631619 ("ARM: initial LMB
trial") and some others from the arm tree.
Ben, is there no way to retain the old APIs while creating the new ones?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists