[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1280765724.5745.4.camel@groeck-laptop>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:15:24 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@...ia.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Nick Cheng <nick.cheng@...ca.com.tw>,
James Smart <james.smart@...lex.com>,
Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@...lex.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>,
Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...abs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Remove owner field from sysfs attribute structure
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 10:36 -0400, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 08:28:10PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 10:45 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On 07/29/2010 07:09 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > The following comment is found in include/linux/sysfs.h:
> > > >
> > > > /* FIXME
> > > > * The *owner field is no longer used.
> > > > * x86 tree has been cleaned up. The owner
> > > > * attribute is still left for other arches.
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > As it turns out, the *owner field is (again?) initialized in several modules,
> > > > suggesting that such initialization may be creeping back into the code.
> > > >
> > > > This patch set removes the above comment, the *owner field, and each instance
> > > > in the code where it was found to be initialized.
> > > >
> > > > Compiled with x86 allmodconfig as well as with all alpha, arm, mips, powerpc,
> > > > and sparc defconfig builds.
> > >
> > > Yeah, the change is way overdue. Maybe we should have just removed
> > > them back then.
> >
> > I'm happy with the powerpc related patches as long as we all agree that
> > needs to go. Do you need me to put some of this in powerpc.git or are
> > you carrying them all to Linus ?
>
> I can carry them all in my driver-core tree if you don't object.
>
Any final verdict ?
Not that it is my decision to make, but I think it would be better to
have it all in one tree. Otherwise the timing for the last patch would
get a bit complicated.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists