linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C56F7FE.2030700@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:53:18 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>, jeremy@...p.org,
	Ian.Campbell@...rix.com, albert_herranz@...oo.es, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB.

On 08/02/2010 09:42 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> 
> Let me go to my favorite coffee shop and think this one through.
> Can I get concession for putting the original patch in (the simple, dumb one),
> and then:
>  - start working on the IOMMU register interface without having to try
>    to get it done for 2.6.36, and
>  - do the driverization as a seperate cleanup.
> 

That makes sense.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/