[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100802170553.GA7767@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:05:53 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [000/165] 2.6.32.17-rc1 -stable review
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 02:19:19AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:15:50 -0700
> Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
>
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.32.17 release.
> > There are 165 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> > wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >
> > Responses should be made by August 1, 2010, 18:00:00 UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.32.17-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
>
> I still don't see this one in 2.6.32-stable:
>
> commit 1f5a81e41f8b1a782c68d3843e9ec1bfaadf7d72 upstream.
> Subject: ext4: Make sure the MOVE_EXT ioctl can't overwrite append-only files
>
> This fixes CVE-2010-2066; I'm pretty sure 2.6.32 is vulnerable.
Ick. I have 40+ ext4 patches already in this release, and here we
didn't get one that really mattered :)
Ted, care to forward on the needed patch(s) to me?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists