[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100802180051.GX3863@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 23:30:51 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
gthelen@...gle.com, m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7][memcg] virtually indexed array library.
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2010-07-29 13:27:03]:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:32:26 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:45:13 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > > My gut reaction to this sort of thing is "run away in terror". It
> > > encourages kernel developers to operate like lackadaisical userspace
> > > developers and to assume that underlying code can perform heroic and
> > > immortal feats. But it can't. This is the kernel and the kernel is a
> > > tough and hostile place and callers should be careful and defensive and
> > > take great efforts to minimise the strain they put upon other systems.
> > >
> > > IOW, can we avoid doing this?
> > >
> >
>
> I'll use pre-allocated pointer array in the next version. It's simple even
> if a bit slow.
>
> ==
> struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroups[CONFIG_MAX_MEM_CGROUPS] __read_mostly;
> #define id_to_memcg(id) mem_cgroups[id];
> ==
Hmm.. I thought we were going to reuse css_id() and use that to get to
the cgroup. May be I am missing something.
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists