linux-kernel - Re: Preview of changes to the Security susbystem for 2.6.36

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C57135F.4070404@ontolinux.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:50:07 +0200
From:	Christian Stroetmann <stroetmann@...olinux.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
CC:	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Preview of changes to the Security susbystem for 2.6.36

Aloha Serge;
On the 02.08.2010 20:08, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Christian Stroetmann (stroetmann@...olinux.com):
>    
>> Aloha James, Aloha Kees;
>> Ont the 02.08.2010 08:57,  Kees Cook wrote:
>>      
>>> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
>>>        
>>>> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>>          
>>>>> Well, at least I'll have something for my summit presentation again.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand, it's rather hard for me to defend against a private NAK.
>>>>>            
>> A private NAK against a company's developer's OK
>> Where is the difference private and company? I thought that it
>> doesn't matter who and what a developer is, and where she/he comes
>> from.
>>      
> That's not what private means in this case.  A private nak is one made
> in a private email, so that the list - and the submitter - can't see the
> rationale.  It is problematic because it doesn't really allow the other
> party to address the objection.
>
> (No big deal - Christoph has since responded in public.)
>
>    

Sorry, but AFAIK the NAK by Christoph that I meant was written in a 
public e-mail with full context to the LSM mailing list some weeks ago 
around the end of June (23 June 2010?!) and I thought Kees meant this 
NAK. :D

But thanks for trying to clearify the case.

Sorry Kees, if you indeed meant with private NAK a NAK made in a private 
e-mail.

Have fun
Christian Stroetmann
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/