linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [Stable-review] [116/165] ext4: dont return to userspace after freezing the fs with a mutex held

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100802184806.GA16878@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Aug 2010 11:48:06 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [stable] [Stable-review] [116/165] ext4: dont return to
 userspace after freezing the fs with a mutex held

On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:02:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 08/02/2010 07:04 AM, Stefan Bader wrote:
> > We have reports about this patch breaking lvm snapshhots. Eric, there is a patch
> > mentioned which is supposed to fix things but its not upstream, yet.
> > Do you know what happened to that?
> 
> right, patch below is needed to fix things.
> 
> Ted just acked it on the list recently; Greg, I'd either drop 116/165
> for now, or include the patch below which should be upstream soon...

I can't take anything that isn't upstream yet.

And I just released with this patch in the kernel, should I do a revert
and do a new release?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/