[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C563F44.9080300@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:45:08 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Naren A Devaiah <naren.devaiah@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 2.6.35-rc6-tip 9/14] trace: uprobes trace_event interface
Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 02:04:14PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
>>> index c681fa7..16e2a8c 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
>>> @@ -482,6 +482,22 @@ config RING_BUFFER_BENCHMARK
>>>
>>> If unsure, say N.
>>>
>>> +config UPROBE_EVENT
>>> + bool "Enable uprobes-based dynamic events"
>>> + depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES
>>> + depends on MMU
>>> + select UPROBES
>>> + select PROBE_EVENTS
>>> + select TRACING
>>> + default n
>>> + help
>>> + This allows the user to add tracing events on top of userspace dynamic
>>> + events (similar to tracepoints) on the fly via the traceevents interface.
>>> + Those events can be inserted wherever uprobes can probe, and record
>>> + various registers.
>>> + This option is required if you plan to use perf-probe subcommand of perf
>>> + tools on user space applications.
>>> +
>> Possible enhancement: Moving this config right after KPROBE_EVENT, because
>> those two provide similar dynamic events.
>>
>> Thank you,
>
>
> In fact this could be a menu "Dynamic Probes", perhaps default off, inside
> which Kprobes and Uprobes would be default on (but depend on "Dynamic Probes").
>
> So that you can quickly enable them all in one.
Hmm, I disagree with it, because both Kprobes and Uprobes provides
APIs for modules too.
I'd like to suggest below config tree
Kenrel hacking
- Kprobes
- Uprobes
- Tracing
-- Dynamic Events
depends on Kprobes || Uprobes
or
select Kprobes && Uprobes
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
2nd Research Dept.
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists