linux-kernel - Re: oops in ioapic_write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:00:46 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: oops in ioapic_write_entry

Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> writes:

>>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
>>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
>>> @@ -1029,10 +1029,7 @@ static int pin_2_irq(int idx, int apic,
>>>  	} else {
>>>  		u32 gsi = mp_gsi_routing[apic].gsi_base + pin;
>>>  
>>> -		if (gsi >= NR_IRQS_LEGACY)
>>> -			irq = gsi;
>>> -		else
>>> -			irq = gsi_top + gsi;
>>> +		irq = gsi_to_irq(gsi);
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>
> what is the point for making irq = gsi_top + gsi when mptable is used instead of acpi?

Because it is only convention that when mptables are used that the
first apic pins 0-15 are the ISA irqs.  This thread witnessed and a
pci irq that came in pin < 16 that was not an ISA irq.  The truly rare
and exotic case would be for the ISA irqs to be outside the first 16
ioapic pins but the es7000 did exactly that.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/