[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008031205040.3225@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:06:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tejun Heo <teheo@...e.de>
cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL tip/genirq] Please pull from lost-spurious-irq
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > And it's even less of an issue as the main users of this misfeature
> > are laptops and desktop machines, where locality is not really that
> > important. If an enterprise admin decides to ignore the fact that the
> > hardware is flaky, then he does not care about the cache line bounces
> > either.
>
> These problems do happen on intel chipset machines and is something
> which can be worked around with some effort. Eh, let's talk on the
> other reply.
So you're saying that the ATA problem is restricted to Intel chipsets?
Do we know the root cause ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists