[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100803105941.GA2996@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 06:59:41 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] core_pattern: fix long parameters was truncated
by core_pattern handler
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:50:13PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Also. Not sure this really makes sense, but if we ever need to expand the
> string, perhaps it makes sense to remeber this fact so that the next time
> we start with len > CORENAME_MAX_SIZE. In any case, I think this needs a
> separate patch.
>
> Oleg.
Yes, this is what I alluded to in my initial reply. We need to keep an atomic
value to track the maximum number of times we've called expand_corename to help
prevent us having to call it repeatedly on every crash. Something like this:
expand_corename(**corename, **out_end, **out_ptr)
{
...
*corename = krealloc(*corename,
CORENAME_MAX_SIZE*
atomic_inc_return(call_count),
GFP_KERNEL);
...
}
do_coredump(...)
{
...
corename = kmalloc(CORENAME_MAX_SIZE *
atomic_read(call_count),
GFP_KERNEL);
...
}
That will train the path to allocate a sensible size after the first crash, and
avoid lots of calls to krealloc in the pessimal case
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists