[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100803135420.GV29507@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:54:20 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com, Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf: symbol offset breakage with separated debug
Em Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:48:34PM +0100, Dave Martin escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I've hit some problems in trying to get perf record/report to
> work correctly on systems with separated debug images (Ubuntu,
> in particular). I worked on some patches to ensure that
> separate debug images do actually get loaded, when present --
> these commits have now been merged in linux-2.6-tip/master.
> (See below for a list of the commits.)
>
> Now that these are in place, I'm observing a new problem which
> can mess up symbol locations -- though I think there might be a
> practical workaround, I can't see a trivial solution, so I'm
> keen to hear if anyone has any ideas.
>
>
> The problem:
>
> perf makes some incorrect assumptions, which mean that the
> symbol locations seen by perf report and friends can be
> incorrect.
>
> My analysis:
>
> a) perf represents symbols as offsets from the start of
> the mmap'd code region which contains each
> symbol.
The symbol library in perf uses separate map_ip and unmap_ip to cope
with those, covering things like prelinked binaries, the kernel with its
absolute addresses, kexec cases where we capture a reference relocation
symbol so that we can adjust later when using the unrelocated vmlinux,
etc.
> b) For shared libs (ET_DYN objects), the desired offset
> is (usually) equal to the VMA of each given
VMA here stands for Virtual Memory Address, not Virtual Memory Area
where a map is loaded, right? I guess so, but trying to get to common
ground.
> symbol in the image. Perf assumes that these
> offsets are always equal, and this normally
> works.
>
> Atypical link configurations could cause this
Which ones? We need to detect those and act accordingly, doing
adjustments at load time or by using a separate map_ip/unmap_ip pair of
functions in struct map.
I'll continue reading your patches, the first one probably fixes a bug,
but wonder if you looked at the struct map->{map_ip,unmap_ip} routines
in tools/perf/util/map.h.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists