[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1008031133270.1853-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:34:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
cc: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
<gregkh@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]drivers/usb/core/sysfs.c Fix variable 'retval' set
but not used
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > Failure to create a file in sysfs is almost never fatal and usually not
> > even dangerous. Ignoring the error is generally better than failing
> > the entire operation.
>
> Then why the __must_check attribute if it's usually ignorable? I thought
> that was reserved for functions that you damned sight better well check
> for errors because bad things are afoot otherwise?
That's a good question. Perhaps Greg KH knows the answer.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists