[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100803163508.GA7914@albatros>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:35:08 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] parisc: superio: do not use PCI resources before
pci_enable_device()
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:11 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 19:44 +0400, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> > drivers/parisc/superio.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/parisc/superio.c b/drivers/parisc/superio.c
> > index f7806d8..c8a36a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/parisc/superio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/parisc/superio.c
> > @@ -169,8 +169,6 @@ superio_init(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > /* ...then properly fixup the USB to point at suckyio PIC */
> > sio->usb_pdev->irq = superio_fixup_irq(sio->usb_pdev);
> >
> > - printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Found NS87560 Legacy I/O device at %s (IRQ %i)\n",
> > - pci_name(pdev), pdev->irq);
> >
> > pci_read_config_dword (pdev, SIO_SP1BAR, &sio->sp1_base);
> > sio->sp1_base &= ~1;
> > @@ -204,6 +202,9 @@ superio_init(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > ret = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> > BUG_ON(ret < 0); /* not too much we can do about this... */
> >
> > + printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Found NS87560 Legacy I/O device at %s (IRQ %i)\n",
> > + pci_name(pdev), pdev->irq);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Next project is programming the onboard interrupt controllers.
> > * PDC hasn't done this for us, since it's using polled I/O.
>
> This really makes no sense; we want the information printed before we
> start all the discovery prints, not after.
Right, I missed it.
> I assume lots of
> initialisers want this too, so it looks particularly silly not to have
> pci_name() returning the correct value until enable time.
>
> If this is just the name initially assigned may change, this definitely
> isn't true for parisc, and even for other things, it would be better to
> print something than nothing.
Not name, but pdev-irq. I was not searching for pci_name() as you can
see in coccinelle script :)
As it is only printing wrong value, the worst case is fooling user that
reads logs.
Is it OK to move pci_enable_device() just before this printk()?
>
> James
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists