[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1280802701.5836.10.camel@falcon.homelinux.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:31:41 -0400
From: Donald Parsons <dparsons@...ghtdsl.net>
To: Harald Hoyer <harald.hoyer@...il.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.35
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 18:08 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Donald Parsons <dparsons@...ghtdsl.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 21:38 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> On Sunday, August 01, 2010 08:31:02 pm Donald Parsons wrote:
> >> > 2.6.35 still fails to boot for me, as first reported here:
> >> > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.3/01144.html
> >> >
> >> > I've manually bisected it down to around May 20 between
> >> > 2.6.34-git4 (boots) and 2.6.34-git5 (boot fails)
> >> > Also -git[23] boot, and -git8, -rc[126], rc6-git[136] all fail.
> >> >
> >> > Unfortunately first time I tried was with 2.6.35-rc6 and
> >> > it failed to boot.
> >> >
> >> > Failure when switching from initramfs to real /root?
> >> > Removing kernel "quiet" param appears to show several
> >> > lines listing:
> >> >
> >> > usb drives/hubs? followed by
> >> > dracut switching root (when booting works)
> >> > or
> >> > usb drives/hubs? followed by
> >> > (missing dracut... line)
> >> > No root device found
> >> > Boot has failed, sleeping forever. (when it does not boot)
> >> >
> >> > Grub, typical entry:
> >> > title Fedora (2.6.35)
> >> > root (hd0,0)
> >> > kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.35 ro
> >> > root=UUID=686dc496-8814-4c36-8fb7-5ded2916e825 rhgb
> >> > SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 KEYTABLE=us
> >> > rdblacklist=nouveau init=/sbin/bootchartd
> >> > initrd /initramfs-2.6.35.img
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > My boot failure seems to be different than other two reported
> >> > in the thread "2.6.35-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34"
> >> > under Bug #16173 and #16228
> >>
> >> Will it boot with the "pci=nocrs" option? If so, please open a
> >
> > No, I tried this on a few attempts when I saw it mentioned under
> > bug #16228. But it had no effect/benefit. Sorry, I should have
> > mentioned this.
> >
> >> report at https://bugzilla.kernel.org, mark it a regression, assign
> >> it to me, and attach the complete dmesg log. And please respond to
> >> this thread with a pointer to the bugzilla.
> >>
> >> Otherwise, a complete console log should have a clue. The best
> >> thing would be a log from a serial console or netconsole, with
> >> "ignore_loglevel".
> >
> > Maybe I will try netconsole tomorrow. But is Ethernet up when
> > this boot failure happens? I think not, since initramfs should
> > not need networking.
> >
> > Should I try building sata driver into kernel? Oh, I am using
> > ext3, and fdisk -l shows:
>
> # dracut --add-drivers "sata" ....
>
> or edit /etc/dracut.conf:
>
> add_drivers+=" sata "
But the kernel used to boot with same identical modules before
but not after 2.6.34-git4.
--------
Using your suggestion as to where the problem lies, I investigated
more deeply and found:
I've now got 2.6.35-rc6-git3 to boot (and almost certainly 2.6.35 final)
Make oldconfig broke at the transition where boot began failed, ie,
between 2.6.34-git4 and 2.6.34-git5. Even though modules are the
same, boot fails. If I use gconfig and set CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=y
instead of CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=m it works, except cannot select =y
unless CONFIG_ATA changed from m to y.
So at some point in past, make oldconfig had apparently changed
CONFIG_SATA_AHCI from y to m and system still booted. But between
2.6.34-git4 and 2.6.34-git5 the ability to boot was lost.
So make oldconfig is not 100% trustworthy in this case. I do not
know if this is a problem that should be fixed. Ask if you want
any .config diffs.
I am going to reboot with 2.6.35 to make sure it boots. Yes!
I consider this boot problem solved unless someone wants to
improve "make oldconfig" behavior.
Thanks,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists