linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] sata_fsl,mv,nv: prepare for NCQ command completion update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:22:47 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, bphilips@...e.de,
	yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	gregkh@...e.de, khali@...ux-fr.org,
	Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@...escale.com>,
	Saeed Bishara <saeed@...vell.com>, Mark Lord <liml@....ca>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] sata_fsl,mv,nv: prepare for NCQ command
 completion update

On 08/02/2010 03:18 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jeff.
>
> On 08/02/2010 01:47 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> So, something like this.  I tested both flavors of sata_nv but don't
>>> have access to sata_mv or sata_fsl, but the conversion is pretty
>>> straight forward and failures should be pretty easy to catch.
>>
>> applied
>
> Are you planning on applying the second patch too?

sata_mv is behaving weirdly in 2.6.35 + these patches, on the older 6081 
chip, embedded in a Dell server box.  Looking into it...

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/