[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100804045813.GA33951@dspnet.fr>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 06:58:13 +0200
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Cc: david@...g.hm, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
pavel@....cz, florian@...kler.org, rjw@...k.pl,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, swetland@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:39:22PM -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> If you just program the alarm you will wake up see that the monotonic
> clock has not advanced and set the alarm another n seconds into the
> future. Or are proposing that suspend should be changed to keep the
> monotonic clock running?
You're supposed to fix the clock after you wake up. That's part of
the cost of going suspend.
OG.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists