[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100804072302.44b6ec30@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 07:23:02 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
mark gross <markgross@...gnar.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the net tree
Hi,
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:14:11 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the suspend tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c between commit
> c128ec29208d410568469bd8bb373b4cdc10912a ("e1000e: register pm_qos
> request on hardware activation") from the net tree and commit
> 82f682514a5df89ffb3890627eebf0897b7a84ec ("pm_qos: Get rid of the
> allocation in pm_qos_add_request()") from the suspend tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
This is the right fix. Thx.
Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists