| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:14:05 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Andrea Bastoni <bastoni@...unc.edu> Cc: Bjoern Brandenburg <bbb@...il.unc.edu>, Raistlin <raistlin@...ux.it>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Song Yuan <song.yuan@...csson.com>, Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Nicola Manica <nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it>, Luca Abeni <lucabe72@...il.it>, Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>, Harald Gustafsson <harald.gustafsson@...csson.com>, Giuseppe Lipari <lipari@...is.sssup.it> Subject: Re: periods and deadlines in SCHED_DEADLINE On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 23:52 -0400, Andrea Bastoni wrote: > Instead, if you want to use the cpuset + affinity to define possibly _overlapping_ clusters (or > containers, or servers) to support different budgets on each CPU (something similar to cgroup, > see [1,3]), forcing only two configuration (single cpu/full cluster) may be restrictive. cpusets doesn't allow overlapping load-balance domains as it stands today. In that case it would end up being a single large domain. With cpu affinity we can of course create whatever we want, hence my suggestion to limit allowed affinity masks to 1 cpu or the full load-balance domain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists