[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1280910830.1902.144.camel@pasglop>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:33:50 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument from sysrq ops
handlers
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 00:59 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Noone is using tty argument so let's get rid of it.
While talking about sysrq...
I noticed that serial drivers call sysrq with the uart lock held.
I've seen deadlocks caused by that, for example, when entering the
debugger, it waits forever for a CPU which is itself waiting on the UART
lock.
I have a patch to drop the lock in serial_core.h, I'll post that
tomorrow hopefully, just checking if there's any objection there ? The
serial drivers might need to be audited a bit to make sure they cope
with the lock being dropped and re-acquired around the sysrq call.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists