| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1008041351100.19930@uplift.swm.pp.se> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:53:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@....pp.se> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>, Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@...it-management.at>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com Subject: Re: How to track down abysmal performance ata - raid1 - crypto - vg/lv - xfs On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The good news is that you have it tracked down, the bad news is that I > know very little about dm-crypt. Maybe the issue is the single threaded > decryption in dm-crypt? Can you check how much CPU time the dm crypt > kernel thread uses? I'm not sure it's that. I have a Core i5 with AES-NI and that didn't significantly increase my overall performance, as it's not there the bottleneck is (at least in my system). I earlier sent out an email wondering if someone could shed some light on how scheduling, block caching and read-ahead works together when one does disks->md->crypto->lvm->fs, becase that's a lot of layers and potentially a lot of unneeded buffering, readahead and scheduling magic? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@....pp.se -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists