[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bp9ie7vf.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:05:08 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] Merge kexec-tools into the kernel tree
ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>
> I'm afraid that someone has a good answer for why their lives would be
> simpler if /sbin/kexec was in the kernel tree and I will be absolutely
> horrified and about someones stupidity when I hear that answer.
Same here. In fact I guess it would be counter productive: it would
discourage a stable API between the kernel and the user tool.
We're seeing this problem with other user tools which are in
the kernel tree.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists