linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] Fix 32-bit CPU hotplug issue on AMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1280940316-7966-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org>
Date:	Wed,  4 Aug 2010 18:45:14 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To:	<hpa@...or.com>, <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	<andreas.herrmann3@....com>, conny.seidel@....com,
	<joerg.roedel@....com>, Bhavna.Sarathy@....com, <greg@...ah.com>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Fix 32-bit CPU hotplug issue on AMD

From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>

Hi,

the following two patches fix an issue which one of our tests triggers
here on a 32-bit kernel while exercising the CPU hotplug path. More
details are to be found in the respective commit messages.

Now, considering the seriousness of the issue, I'd very much like
to backport the fixes to .32 and .34. And while the fixes are not
oneliners, they're straightforward enough to not cause any problems
IMHO. But I may be biased from staring at them for a while now so what
do you guys, think, any objections to backporting those?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/