[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100804170838.GE28217@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:08:38 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'devel@...verdev.osuosl.org'" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"'virtualization@...ts.osdl.org'" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] staging: hv: Increased storvsc ringbuffer and
max_io_requests
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 03:23:09AM +0000, Hank Janssen wrote:
>
> >>And than Greg KH spoke these words:
> >>On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:31:55PM +0000, Hank Janssen wrote:
> > >From: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>
> > >
> > >Increased storvsc ringbuffer and max_io_requests. This now more
> > >closely mimics the numbers on Hyper-V.
> >
> >What do you mean by this? The max provided by the hypervisor?
>
> Max_IO is set to double from what it was before, Hyper-V allows it and
> We have had appliance builder requests to see if it was a problem to increase
> The number.
>
> Ringbuffer size for storvsc is now increased because I have seen
> A few buffer problems on extremely busy systems. They where
> Set pretty low before. And since max_io_requests is increased I
> Really needed to increase the buffer as well.
>
> >> And will allow more IO requests to take place for the SCSI driver.
> >
> >Which means what, better throughput? Or just more outstanding requests and the same speed overall?
>
> It means better throughput of high load systems, else you get buffer
> Contention.
All good, care to included this in the changelog comment when you resend
this whole series?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists