linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] ceph: rbd depends on BLOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100804101624.5189893c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:16:24 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -next] ceph: rbd depends on BLOCK

From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>

When CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, fs/ceph/rbd has:
file: fs/ceph/rbd.c: errors: 71, warnings: 18

This is due to BLOCK being spelled as CONFIG_BLOCK
(and depends on being spelled as select).

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
---
 fs/ceph/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-next-20100804.orig/fs/ceph/Kconfig
+++ linux-next-20100804/fs/ceph/Kconfig
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ config CEPH_FS_PRETTYDEBUG
 config CEPH_RBD
 	bool "Rados block device (RBD)"
 	depends on CEPH_FS
-	select  CONFIG_BLOCK
+	depends on BLOCK
 	default y
 	help
 	  If you say Y here, ceph will include rbd, the RADOS block

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/