linux-kernel - Re: missing .data.shared_align placement in vmlinux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikz7pvirg7VUxrm-6v=yrLwHy4UeaJTS0wz3BLc@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:12:03 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>
Subject: Re: missing .data.shared_align placement in vmlinux

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 07:56, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 04:58:53PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> am i missing something or does the .data.shared_align section lack
>> definition in vmlinux.lds.h and all arch vmlinux.lds.S files ?
>>
>> with the recent change "net: remove time limit in process_backlog()",
>> the softnet_data variable changed from "DEFINE_PER_CPU()" to
>> "DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED()" which moved it from the .data section to
>> the .data.shared_align section.  i'm not saying this patch is wrong,
>> just that is what caused me to notice this larger problem.  no one
>> else in the kernel is using this aligned macro variant, so i imagine
>> that's why no one has noticed yet.
>>
>> since .data.shared_align isnt declared in any vmlinux files that i can
>> see, the linker just places it last.  this "just works" for most
>> people, but when building a ROM kernel on Blackfin systems, it causes
>> section overlap errors:
>> bfin-uclinux-ld.real: section .init.data [00000000202e06b8 ->
>> 00000000202e48b7] overlaps section .data.shared_aligned
>> [00000000202e06b8 -> 00000000202e0723]
>> i imagine other arches which support the ROM config option and thus do
>> funky placement would see similar issues ...
>>
>> on x86, it is stuck in a dedicated section:
>>   [ 8] .data             PROGBITS        ffffffff810ec000 2ec000
>> 0303a8 00  WA  0   0 4096
>>   [ 9] .data.shared_alig PROGBITS        ffffffff8111c3c0 31c3c0
>> 0000c8 00  WA  0   0 64
>>
>> the ifdef forest in asm-generic/percpu.h is beyond a quick glance &
>> fix, so i leave it up to someone else ;)
>
> as there any resolution on this?
> I briefly looked at it some time ago.
> And it looks like a plain oversight.

no, it's still broken in 2.6.35 :(
$ make ARCH=blackfin BF537-STAMP_defconfig
$ make ARCH=blackfin -s -j4
$ readelf -WS vmlinux | grep '\<data\>'
  [10] .data             PROGBITS        0018369c 17269c 012964 00  WA  0   0  4
  [11] .data..shared_aligned PROGBITS        00196000 185000 00006c 00
 WA  0   0  4
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/