[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100804195008.GB2134@shell>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:50:08 -0400
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jblunck@...e.de, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/38] union-mount: Support for mounting union mount file systems
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:55:39PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> > Create and tear down union mount structures on mount. Check
> > requirements for union mounts. This version clones the read-only
> > mounts and puts them in an array hanging off the superblock of the
> > topmost layer.
>
> If I do
>
> mount -r fs1 /mnt
> mount -r fs2 /mnt
> mount -ounion fs3 /mnt
>
> then only fs2 and fs3 will be unioned.
>
> Or how are multiple read-only layers supposed to work?
You have it right, this is a bug in lookup in the last version I sent
out. I had commented out the part of my test suite that actually
tested three layer mounts so I didn't notice when I broke it. :/ I'll
post a new version with the fix today.
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists