[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100804201341.GC30740@infomag.iguana.be>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 22:13:41 +0200
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To: dann frazier <dannf@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Mingarelli <thomas.mingarelli@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] Despecificate driver from iLO2
Hi Dan,
> This driver supports both iLO2 and iLO3, but our user-visible strings
> currently only reference iLO2. Let's just call it "iLO" to avoid having
> to update strings for each iLO generation. This driver doesn't support
> iLO ASICs prior to iLO2, but that is sufficiently explained in Kconfig.
Just a thought: Wouldn't it be more consistent if it's called iLO2+ everywhere?
> - tristate "HP Proliant iLO 2 Hardware Watchdog Timer"
> + tristate "HP Proliant iLO Hardware Watchdog Timer"
would be: tristate "HP Proliant iLO2+ Hardware Watchdog Timer"
> - .identity = "HP iLO2 HW Watchdog Timer",
> + .identity = "HP iLO HW Watchdog Timer",
and: .identity = "HP iLO2+ HW Watchdog Timer",
> - * First let's find out if we are on an iLO2 server. We will
> + * First let's find out if we are on an iLO2+ server. We will
> - dev_warn(&dev->dev,
> - "This server does not have an iLO2 ASIC.\n");
> + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "This server does not have an iLO ASIC"
> + " version 2 or greater.\n");
dev_warn(&dev->dev,
"This server does not have an iLO2+ ASIC.\n");
> - "Unable to detect the iLO2 server memory.\n");
> + "Unable to detect the iLO server memory.\n");
"Unable to detect the iLO2+ server memory.\n");
For the rest I'm still reviewing the code.
Kind regards,
Wim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists