[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100805064011.GB4630@verge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:40:12 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] Merge kexec-tools into the kernel tree
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:06:48PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After all the excitement of relocating kexec-tools from
> one location on kernel.org to another last week it was
> suggested to me by Michael Neuling that the merging
> kexec-tools into the kernel tree would be a good idea.
>
> Given that there have been a bunch of issues with kexec
> on power that this would resolve. and there is precedence
> for tools in the kernel tree, this sounds entirely reasonable to me.
> So with my kexec-tools maintainer hat on, I would like to start
> a conversation about this.
Thanks to everyone for their responses. I think we can safely conclude
that the body of opinion is that its not appropriate for kexec-tools
to be included in the kernel tree. Primarily because it isn't tied
closely to the kernel ABI. As such I withdraw this proposal.
Thanks in particular to those who offered ideas on how to resolve
some of the problems that kexec-tools faces. Lets make those ideas happen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists