[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100805094545.GB22207@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:45:46 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb gadget: don't save bind callback in struct
usb_configuration
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:05:47AM +0200, Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:27:46 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
>> The bind function is only called at init time so there is no need to
>> save a pointer to it in the driver struct.
>
> This is not entirely true. How about such wording:
>
> The bind function is often called only at init time so there is no neet
> to save a pointer to it in the configuration structure.
OK.
> Also note, that if you are fixing composite gadgets as well, there's also
> usb_composite_driver structure and accompanying usb_composite_register()
> function.
This is ortogonal to my two patches, right? Will look into it later.
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists