[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinorqhrmgZ8neRc4SqoUA-r3cHfuVr55a-V8HB4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 07:56:14 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lp3971: remove unnecessary ret value checking in
lp3971_i2c_write()
2010/8/5 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:22:13PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> 2010/8/5 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
>
>> > but can I once more renew my request that you make some effort to
>> > provide subject lines for your patches which are consistent with the
>> > standard used for the area of the kernel you're submitting to?
>
>> I think we have communication problem.
>> I thought the subject "[PATCH 1/2] lp3971: remove unnecessary ret
>> value checking in lp3971_i2c_write()"
>> is pretty clear.
>> Or do you mean something else?
>
> In this case pretty much every regulator API patch has a subject line
> starting "regulator: " but none of your patches do this, you have
> created your own style which you use over all your patches.
>
Got your point now. Will fix it next time.
Thanks,
Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists