[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100806111339.GA8259@ioremap.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:13:39 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>, kyle@...fetthome.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au,
dhowells@...hat.com, gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Initcall ordering problem (TTY vs modprobe vs MD5) and cryptomgr problem
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:39:00PM +0800, Herbert Xu (herbert@...dor.apana.org.au) wrote:
> So you'd rather have a box that doesn't boot rather than one
> that automatically falls back to software crypto allowing you
> to diagnose and report the problem.
What about kernel boot parameter to test hardware accelerators or not?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists