[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100806124341.GG31326@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:43:41 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, david@...g.hm,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pavel@....cz, florian@...kler.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
swetland@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 06:29:27PM -0700, Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote:
> sleep_time, total time the wake lock has been active when the screen was off.
This one seems a little odd, and won't make sense on some devices like
those with E Ink displays or those which don't have screens at all. I
guess it's really focused on metering when the user is not actively
interacting with the device?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists