linux-kernel - Re: [00/38] 2.6.35.1-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 06 Aug 2010 22:14:46 +0300
From:	Thomas Backlund <tmb@...driva.org>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [00/38] 2.6.35.1-stable review

06.08.2010 21:32, Greg KH skrev:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.35.1 release.
> There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> us know.  If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
> to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
>
> Responses should be made by August 8, 2010, 18:00:00 UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.35.1-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


I think this one should be added as soon as possible too:


> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/linus/396e894d289d69bacf5acd983c97cd6e21a14c08
> Commit:     396e894d289d69bacf5acd983c97cd6e21a14c08
> Parent:     f469461df6ff822f71b8737bda86eea20f16ff93
> Author:     Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> AuthorDate: Fri Jul 9 15:12:27 2010 +0200
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CommitDate: Sat Jul 17 12:05:44 2010 +0200
>
>     sched: Revert nohz_ratelimit() for now
>
>     Norbert reported that nohz_ratelimit() causes his laptop to burn about
>     4W (40%) extra. For now back out the change and see if we can adjust
>     the power management code to make better decisions.
>
>     Reported-by: Norbert Preining <preining@...ic.at>
>     Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>     Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
>     Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
>     LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
>     Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

--
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/