[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100806192116.186301418@clark.site>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:20:01 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: [20/36] iwlwifi: fix scan abort
2.6.34-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
commit d28232b461b8d54b09e59325dbac8b0913ce2049 upstream.
Fix possible double priv->mutex lock introduced by commit
a69b03e941abae00380fc6bc1877fb797a1b31e6
"iwlwifi: cancel scan watchdog in iwl_bg_abort_scan" .
We can not call cancel_delayed_work_sync(&priv->scan_check) with
priv->mutex locked because workqueue function iwl_bg_scan_check()
take that lock internally.
We do not need to synchronize when canceling priv->scan_check work.
We can avoid races (sending double abort command or send no
command at all) using STATUS_SCAN_ABORT bit. Moreover
current iwl_bg_scan_check() code seems to be broken, as
we should not send abort commands when currently aborting.
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c | 18 ++++++++----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
@@ -607,11 +607,10 @@ void iwl_bg_scan_check(struct work_struc
return;
mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
- if (test_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status) ||
- test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status)) {
- IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "Scan completion watchdog resetting "
- "adapter (%dms)\n",
- jiffies_to_msecs(IWL_SCAN_CHECK_WATCHDOG));
+ if (test_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status) &&
+ !test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status)) {
+ IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "Scan completion watchdog (%dms)\n",
+ jiffies_to_msecs(IWL_SCAN_CHECK_WATCHDOG));
if (!test_bit(STATUS_EXIT_PENDING, &priv->status))
iwl_send_scan_abort(priv);
@@ -950,12 +949,11 @@ void iwl_bg_abort_scan(struct work_struc
!test_bit(STATUS_GEO_CONFIGURED, &priv->status))
return;
- mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
-
- cancel_delayed_work_sync(&priv->scan_check);
- set_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
- iwl_send_scan_abort(priv);
+ cancel_delayed_work(&priv->scan_check);
+ mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
+ if (test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status))
+ iwl_send_scan_abort(priv);
mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_bg_abort_scan);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists