[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100806192115.403787611@clark.site>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:19:52 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Dean Nelson <dnelson@...hat.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [11/36] e1000e: dont inadvertently re-set INTX_DISABLE
2.6.34-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Dean Nelson <dnelson@...hat.com>
commit 36f2407fe52c55566221f8c68c8fb808abffd2f5 upstream.
Should e1000_test_msi() fail to see an msi interrupt, it attempts to
fallback to legacy INTx interrupts. But an error in the code may prevent
this from happening correctly.
Before calling e1000_test_msi_interrupt(), e1000_test_msi() disables SERR
by clearing the SERR bit from the just read PCI_COMMAND bits as it writes
them back out.
Upon return from calling e1000_test_msi_interrupt(), it re-enables SERR
by writing out the version of PCI_COMMAND it had previously read.
The problem with this is that e1000_test_msi_interrupt() calls
pci_disable_msi(), which eventually ends up in pci_intx(). And because
pci_intx() was called with enable set to 1, the INTX_DISABLE bit gets
cleared from PCI_COMMAND, which is what we want. But when we get back to
e1000_test_msi(), the INTX_DISABLE bit gets inadvertently re-set because
of the attempt by e1000_test_msi() to re-enable SERR.
The solution is to have e1000_test_msi() re-read the PCI_COMMAND bits as
part of its attempt to re-enable SERR.
During debugging/testing of this issue I found that not all the systems
I ran on had the SERR bit set to begin with. And on some of the systems
the same could be said for the INTX_DISABLE bit. Needless to say these
latter systems didn't have a problem falling back to legacy INTx
interrupts with the code as is.
Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dnelson@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -3041,13 +3041,18 @@ static int e1000_test_msi(struct e1000_a
/* disable SERR in case the MSI write causes a master abort */
pci_read_config_word(adapter->pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &pci_cmd);
- pci_write_config_word(adapter->pdev, PCI_COMMAND,
- pci_cmd & ~PCI_COMMAND_SERR);
+ if (pci_cmd & PCI_COMMAND_SERR)
+ pci_write_config_word(adapter->pdev, PCI_COMMAND,
+ pci_cmd & ~PCI_COMMAND_SERR);
err = e1000_test_msi_interrupt(adapter);
- /* restore previous setting of command word */
- pci_write_config_word(adapter->pdev, PCI_COMMAND, pci_cmd);
+ /* re-enable SERR */
+ if (pci_cmd & PCI_COMMAND_SERR) {
+ pci_read_config_word(adapter->pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &pci_cmd);
+ pci_cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_SERR;
+ pci_write_config_word(adapter->pdev, PCI_COMMAND, pci_cmd);
+ }
/* success ! */
if (!err)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists