| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:34:43 -0700 From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> To: - <kd6lvw@...oo.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org Subject: Re: [00/38] 2.6.35.1-stable review On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:22:10PM -0700, - wrote: > Does not include the fix to this bug (introduced in 2.6.35.0): > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506 > > Affected file: arch/x86/lib/atomic64_386_32.S > > This issue causes a compile-time blocking failure. The patch fixes the problem for older versions of BINUTILS equal to or more recent than the minimum required version currently listed in file Documentation/Changes. > > Patch: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27360 > > > Please include this in 2.6.35.1 and any other affected kernels. > > The problem was introduced on February 24 through March 1, 2010 by multiple commits, starting with commit a7e926abc3adfbd2e5e20d2b46177adb4e313915. > Which exact patch that is in Linus's tree fixes the problem? Do you have the git commit id of it? That's what I need here. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists