linux-kernel - Re: Initcall ordering problem (TTY vs modprobe vs MD5) and cryptomgr problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimVOkAi1_G9B290fHRR3PbV4H9003VarAv_zbGn@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Aug 2010 21:20:02 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Cc:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Initcall ordering problem (TTY vs modprobe vs MD5) and cryptomgr 
	problem

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au> wrote:
>
> Because it can save data.  Each cryptographic algorithm (such as
> AES) may have multiple impelmentations, some of which are hardware-
> based.

Umm. The _developer_ had better test the thing. That is absolutely
_zero_ excuse for then forcing every boot for every poor user to re-do
the test over and over again.

Guys, this comes up every single time: you as a developer may think
that your code is really important, but get over yourself already.
It's not so important that everybody must be forced to do it.

                      Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/