lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 21:20:02 -0700 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Initcall ordering problem (TTY vs modprobe vs MD5) and cryptomgr problem On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au> wrote: > > Because it can save data. Each cryptographic algorithm (such as > AES) may have multiple impelmentations, some of which are hardware- > based. Umm. The _developer_ had better test the thing. That is absolutely _zero_ excuse for then forcing every boot for every poor user to re-do the test over and over again. Guys, this comes up every single time: you as a developer may think that your code is really important, but get over yourself already. It's not so important that everybody must be forced to do it. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists