linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2 block#for-linus] bio, fs: update READA and SWRITE to match the corresponding BIO_RW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C5B89DB.5050106@oracle.com>
Date:	Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:04:43 +0800
From:	Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...nel.dk>,
	stable@...nel.org, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>,
	Bryan Mesich <bryan.mesich@...u.edu>,
	scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2 block#for-linus] bio, fs: update READA and
 SWRITE to match the corresponding BIO_RW_* bits

Hi Tejun,

On 08/06/2010 02:45 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Tejun Heo<tj@...nel.org>  writes:
>
>> Commit a82afdf (block: use the same failfast bits for bio and request)
>> moved BIO_RW_* bits around such that they match up with REQ_* bits.
>> Unfortunately, fs.h hard coded READ, WRITE, READA and SWRITE as 0, 1,
>> 2 and 3, and expected them to match with BIO_RW_* bits.  READ/WRITE
>> didn't change but BIO_RW_AHEAD was moved to bit 4 instead of bit 1,
>> breaking READA and SWRITE.
>>
>> This patch updates READA and SWRITE such that they match the BIO_RW_*
>> bits again.  A follow up patch will update the definitions to directly
>> use BIO_RW_* bits so that this kind of breakage won't happen again.
>>
>> Stable: The offending commit a82afdf was released with v2.6.32, so
>> this patch should be applied to all kernels since then but it must
>> _NOT_ be applied to kernels earlier than that.
If only this patch goes into stable, do we need to change RWA_MASK in 
this patch also(I have seen you change it the 2/2)?

-#define RWA_MASK        2
+#define RWA_MASK        16

Regards,
Tao

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/