[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim-a6qHL_Xo+iVUW4p79EMMRssa0-AqZenNSYJr@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 03:23:32 -0700
From: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, david@...g.hm,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pavel@....cz, florian@...kler.org, swetland@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
2010/8/7 Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>:
> 2010/8/7 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>:
>> On Saturday, August 07, 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>>> 2010/8/6 Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>:
>>> > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
...
>>> >> total_time, total time the wake lock has been active. This one should
>>> >> be obvious.
>>> >
>>> > Also easily added.
>>> >
>>> Only with a handle passed to all the calls.
>>
>> Well, I'm kind of tired of this "my solution is the only acceptable one"
>> mindset. IMHO, it's totally counter productive.
>>
>
> How do you propose to track how long a driver has blocked suspend when
> you have an unblock call that takes no arguments.
>
Also, I did not not see a response to my question about why you don't
want to pass a handle.
--
Arve Hjønnevåg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists