[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikyRhtfX4R3x_NDgHnXssmfVuhjC5PbhRZ0a7su@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 19:05:37 -0700
From: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arve@...roid.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz,
florian@...kler.org, rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
menage@...gle.com, david-b@...bell.net, James.Bottomley@...e.de,
tytso@....edu, arjan@...radead.org, swmike@....pp.se,
galibert@...ox.com, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:59 PM, <david@...g.hm> wrote:
>
> now, android is betting that the apps are all developed specifically for the
> android from scratch, so having a different API is acceptable, even if it
> cuts them off from the rest of the *nix applications. For a phone this is
> not neccessarily an unreasonable stance, but as Android moves into the
> spaces where normal applications are in use (netbooks and tablets), this
> becomes a much shakier stance to take.
"Normal" apps work reasonably well -- they get halted when the screen
turns off, just like they do when my laptop suspends.
Wakelocks are useful for mobile-centric apps that you want to keep
running in the background, wake up and do work when the device is
"asleep", etc.
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists