[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1281139962-20538-1-git-send-email-ppannuto@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:12:41 -0700
From: Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@...eaurora.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ppannuto@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: [PATCH] platform: Use drv->driver.bus instead of assuming platform_bus_type
In theory (although not *yet* in practice), a driver being passed
to platform_driver_probe might have driver.bus set to something
other than platform_bus_type. Locking drv->driver.bus is always
correct.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@...eaurora.org>
---
drivers/base/platform.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index c6c933f..579906f 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -488,12 +488,12 @@ int __init_or_module platform_driver_probe(struct platform_driver *drv,
* if the probe was successful, and make sure any forced probes of
* new devices fail.
*/
- spin_lock(&platform_bus_type.p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
+ spin_lock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
drv->probe = NULL;
if (code == 0 && list_empty(&drv->driver.p->klist_devices.k_list))
retval = -ENODEV;
drv->driver.probe = platform_drv_probe_fail;
- spin_unlock(&platform_bus_type.p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
if (code != retval)
platform_driver_unregister(drv);
--
1.7.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists