[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 05:12:09 -0700
From: Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
utz lehmann <lkml123@...4n2c.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Volker.Lendecke@...net.de, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsde@...per.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make
extended file stats available [ver #6]
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:38:36PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> I'm curious. Why do you particularly care what interface the kernel uses to
> provide you with access to this attribute?
It's a matter of taste. The *BSD's have this right IMHO. It
should be part of the stat information. A file timestamp is not
an EA. Making it available that way just feels like an appalingly
tasteless kludge. It offends the artist in me :-).
> Or do you really want something like BSD's 'btime' which as I understand it
> cannot be set. Would that be really useful to you?
It is *already* useful to us, and is widely used in
existing code. The occasions when btime is set are
relatively rare, and at that point we store it in a
separate EA for Windows reporting purposes.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists