lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100809115735.0ca4951e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:57:35 +0100 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Alexander Clouter <alex@...riz.org.uk> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]exit.c: support larger exit code > There is probably a deeper reason as errno.h/errno-base.h all seem to be > one byte return codes too. I'm starting to ponder if that top three > bytes are meant to carry some other information? man 2 wait and also note that int was 16bits in the times when Unix wait/exit behaviour was formulated. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/