[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C6009FE.4020702@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 07:00:30 -0700
From: walt <w41ter@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
CC: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fix fallouts from slow-work -> wq conversion
On 08/09/2010 03:20 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> From 9a919c46dfa48a9c1f465174609b90253eb8ffc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tejun Heo<tj@...nel.org>
> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:27 +0200
>
> Commit 991ea75c (drm: use workqueue instead of slow-work), which made
> drm to use wq instead of slow-work, didn't account for the return
> value difference between delayed_slow_work_enqueue() and
> queue_delayed_work(). The former returns 0 on success and -errno on
> failures while the latter never fails and only uses the return value
> to indicate whether the work was already pending or not.
>
> This misconversion triggered spurious error messages. Remove the now
> unnecessary return value check and error message.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> index 4598130..b9e4dbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> @@ -839,7 +839,6 @@ static void output_poll_execute(struct work_struct *work)
> struct drm_connector *connector;
> enum drm_connector_status old_status, status;
> bool repoll = false, changed = false;
> - int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(connector,&dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
> @@ -874,11 +873,8 @@ static void output_poll_execute(struct work_struct *work)
> dev->mode_config.funcs->output_poll_changed(dev);
> }
>
> - if (repoll) {
> - ret = queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, delayed_work, DRM_OUTPUT_POLL_PERIOD);
> - if (ret)
> - DRM_ERROR("delayed enqueue failed %d\n", ret);
> - }
> + if (repoll)
> + queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, delayed_work, DRM_OUTPUT_POLL_PERIOD);
> }
>
> void drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(struct drm_device *dev)
> @@ -893,18 +889,14 @@ void drm_kms_helper_poll_enable(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> bool poll = false;
> struct drm_connector *connector;
> - int ret;
>
> list_for_each_entry(connector,&dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
> if (connector->polled)
> poll = true;
> }
>
> - if (poll) {
> - ret = queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq,&dev->mode_config.output_poll_work, DRM_OUTPUT_POLL_PERIOD);
> - if (ret)
> - DRM_ERROR("delayed enqueue failed %d\n", ret);
> - }
> + if (poll)
> + queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq,&dev->mode_config.output_poll_work, DRM_OUTPUT_POLL_PERIOD);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_kms_helper_poll_enable);
I was getting the same spurious error messages, and this patches fixes it, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists