[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100809152010.GE27747@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:20:10 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb gadget: don't save bind callback in struct
usb_composite_driver
Hello Michał,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 03:33:49PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> The bind function is most of the time only called at init time so there
> is no need to save a pointer to it in the composite driver structure.
>
> This fixes many section mismatches reported by modpost.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
> Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/audio.c | 3 +--
> drivers/usb/gadget/cdc2.c | 3 +--
> drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c | 3 +--
> drivers/usb/gadget/g_ffs.c | 3 +--
> drivers/usb/gadget/hid.c | 3 +--
> drivers/usb/gadget/mass_storage.c | 3 +--
> drivers/usb/gadget/multi.c | 3 +--
> drivers/usb/gadget/serial.c | 3 +--
> drivers/usb/gadget/webcam.c | 3 +--
> drivers/usb/gadget/zero.c | 3 +--
> include/linux/usb/composite.h | 15 +++------------
> 12 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> This replaces Uwe's patch which used __refdata for instances of struct
> usb_composite_driver. This patch replaces usb_composite_register() with
> usb_composite_probe() in similar fashion to other two Uwe's patches.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/audio.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/audio.c
> index a62af7b..5a65fbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/audio.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/audio.c
> @@ -166,13 +166,12 @@ static struct usb_composite_driver audio_driver = {
> .name = "g_audio",
> .dev = &device_desc,
> .strings = audio_strings,
> - .bind = audio_bind,
> .unbind = __exit_p(audio_unbind),
> };
>
> static int __init init(void)
> {
> - return usb_composite_register(&audio_driver);
> + return usb_composite_probe(&audio_driver, audio_bind);
> }
> module_init(init);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/cdc2.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/cdc2.c
> index 928137d..1f2a9b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/cdc2.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/cdc2.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ static struct usb_composite_driver cdc_driver = {
> .name = "g_cdc",
> .dev = &device_desc,
> .strings = dev_strings,
> - .bind = cdc_bind,
> .unbind = __exit_p(cdc_unbind),
> };
>
> @@ -255,7 +254,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> static int __init init(void)
> {
> - return usb_composite_register(&cdc_driver);
> + return usb_composite_probe(&cdc_driver, cdc_bind);
> }
> module_init(init);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
> index 4590c6a..3cafda7 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #define USB_BUFSIZ 1024
>
> static struct usb_composite_driver *composite;
> +static int (*composite_gadget_bind)(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev);
This can be __initdata, can't it?
I thought about usb_composite_drivers, too, and wondered if it would be
sensible to change the additional argument of usb_gadget_probe_driver to
struct usb_gadget_probe_data *probe_data. Then you could do the
following
struct usb_composite_probe_data {
struct usb_gadget_probe_data usb_probe_data;
int (*composite_gadget_bind)(struct usb_composite_dev *);
}
and in composite_bind use container_of to get the gadget_bind function.
Maybe that's overengineered though. As there is already a dependency on
a global variable (i.e. composite) your patch doesn't make it much
worse. Just my 0.02€.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists